Text Size: A-A+

**Bengaluru: **In January, Nalini Anantharaman became the first woman to be awarded an Infosys Science Prize worth $100,000 (approx. Rs 71 lakh) in the mathematics category.

The citation is a mouthful for the lay person — she won the prize for “work related to ‘Quantum Chaos’, specifically for the effective use of entropy in the study of semiclassical limits of eigenstates in quantum analogs of chaotic dynamical systems and for her work on the delocalisation of eigenfunctions on large regular graphs”. But what does that mean?

“I work with questions coming from physics but from a mathematical perspective,” the French mathematician explains. “For the last decade, I’ve been working on equations describing how waves propagate.”

Waves, which could be sound waves, electromagnetic (light) waves, water waves, or waves in quantum mechanics, propagate differently depending on the geometry of their location. In a concert hall, for example, waves will bounce off the walls. But the way they do that depends on the shape of the room and whether it is rectangular or elliptical.

“I try to describe the disorder, the chaotic aspect, that can occur when the wave propagates. These are all problems coming from physics, which I view from my mathematical frame of mind.”

Asked how she felt about receiving the Infosys Science Prize, Anantharaman says: “I’m always a bit embarrassed by awards. I have many colleagues who I think are better than me and haven’t won any awards. Also, achievements in research are often the result of collaborative work.

“…Awards have helped me gain confidence, and I have more freedom in choosing my field of research. In that sense, it’s a very positive thing.”

**Also read:**JNU professor who had hit out at administration denied leave to receive Infosys Prize

**Math was all around**

Anantharaman’s father went to France to study mathematics when he was just 22. There, he met her French mother — they were both professors of mathematics at the University of Orléans.

Having mathematicians for parents meant that Anantharaman was surrounded by math-related objects and discussions throughout her childhood.

At school, she was naturally drawn to science and math, and as a teenager, to biology.

“I had a romantic idea that you can cure a disease with research,” she says. She knew she wanted to become a researcher, but wasn’t sure in which subject.

“Perhaps it was because of my family that I got into mathematics in the end. Not many people are aware that there is research going on in mathematics in France. People believe that at some point in history, maths stopped evolving. That was not so in my case. I knew that you could do research in maths in the 20th century because both my parents are mathematicians.”

Anantharaman completed her PhD at the Université Pierre et Marie Curie in 2000. She has taught at the University of California, Berkeley, the University of Paris-Sud, Orsay, and the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton.

In 2011, Anantharaman won the Grand Prix Jacques Herbrand from the French Academy of Sciences, and the Salem Prize for her work with the Fourier series. In 2012, she won the Henri Poincaré Prize for mathematical physics.

She also plays the piano and, at one point, considered “very seriously” a career in western classical music.

**Also read:**Indo-French math whiz & ‘original’ economist among winners of Infosys science prize

**The India connection**

Anantharaman is more French than Indian, something she attributes to the culture of immigration when she was born.

“When people arrived in the country, they didn’t necessarily speak their native language to their children, something which is very fashionable now. I regret it a little bit that I never learnt Tamil, which is my father’s mother tongue, but I know quite a lot about the Hindu religion and mythology through storytelling,” she says.

“We also experienced a lot of Indian cooking and music. I still feel quite close to Indian, especially the Hindu culture.”

**Also read: **Tired of fake science news? See what plans Modi govt’s top scientist has for the future

**The politics of mathematics**

Anantharaman believes that against conventional perception, mathematics is actually quite tied to humanities and society. She does not believe mathematics is immune to politics, and takes the example of World War II.

After the war, the field faced a severe backlash when applied mathematics began being used to develop the nuclear programme. To protest this, a group of mathematicians decided to abstain from applied mathematics research. This decision influenced math globally, especially in India, where a divide formed between applied and pure mathematics and continues to this day.

“Pure maths institutes and engineering institutes don’t mix,” she says. “In the past, until maybe 100 years ago, mathematicians were also philosophers and they thought a lot about ethical issues. It has stopped at some point, but I think we should once again establish a connection with the social sciences and be aware of the ethical consequences of our work.”

The field is also not immune to the under-representation of women.

“At conferences, sometimes I’m the only woman. In France, just about 17 per cent mathematicians are women. There are even fewer in the purer sub-fields, and as you go up the hierarchy. There is now a lot of thinking in France about the reasons for this. I think I’m quite strong in that I just want to be satisfied with my work, let people think what they want to,” she says.

“I’ve noticed that among students, girls and boys tend to do exams differently, especially in mathematics. When they know only the partial answer, girls say they don’t know, whereas boys are more likely to invent something. I think in their education, they are more encouraged to bluff.

“Even as a researcher, it has taken me time to realise that sometimes my male colleagues behave as if they knew the answer when they actually don’t.”

A commonly adopted, workable solution is often having women in positions of power, especially in hiring committees. But this could backfire too.

“There are so few of us that it’s always the same women in all committees,” she explains. “This is a lot of work for us and it prevents us from doing research. It also means that a handful of women become very powerful. Moreover, I don’t even think that more women are being hired by this.”

Furthermore, Anantharaman states that the representation of women is influenced heavily by culture too.

“Women in India marry early and have children early. Some say professors refused to supervise their PhD because they thought they would have children in the middle of their PhD. This problem does not exist in France,” she says.

*Want to hear experts engage over the big issues of the day? We bring you Talk Point. *

Show Full Article