It began on 16 March, when 10 Indonesians in Telangana were admitted to hospital after one of them showed symptoms of Coronavirus. By 18 March, eight of them were said to be infected by COVID-19.
Then four days later, two Thai nationals tested positive for Coronavirus in Tamil Nadu.
Finally on 26 March, a resident of Kashmir died due to COVID-19, the first fatality for the virus in the state.
What is common between all these people is that they were all reportedly associated with the Tablighi Jamaat and had attended a meet at the Tablighi Jamaat Headquarters - the Banglewali Masjid in Delhi’s Nizamuddin area - between 8-10 March. In the case of a few of the Telangana patients, it was 13-15 March. After their stay in Delhi, they travelled towards South India, where they showed symptoms of COVID-19.
Now, the Delhi government has ordered that an FIR be registered against a Tablighi Jamaat Maulana for leading a congregation in Nizamuddin West allegedly in violation of the Delhi government’s orders prohibiting religious gatherings due to the Coronavirus threat.
On media and social media, there are now attempts use the examples of Tablighi preachers to insinuate that the spread of Corona was an Islamist conspiracy. Pro-Hindutva channel Sudarshan TV went to the extent of calling it “Corona Jihad”.
Imagine the level of Anti-Muslim propaganda if #COVID19 was started from some Muslim country?— Md Asif Khan آصِف (@imMAK02) March 31, 2020
Indian Media/IT Cell is spreading poison in the society. They are literally baying for the blood of Muslims.#मीडिया_वायरस#NizamuddinMarkazpic.twitter.com/1aDctdp9J1
Did Tablighi Jamaat Violate Norms?
Tablighi Jamaat steadfastly maintains that it committed no illegality and that no religious events were held on or after 22 March, the day of the Janata Curfew announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
“When Hon’ble Prime Minister announced the “Janta Curfew”, for 22nd March 2020, the ongoing program in Markaz Nizamuddin was discontinued immediately,” the Tablighi Jamaat Markaz or its headquarters in Delhi said in a press statement.
This is correct. There were indeed no programmes on or after 22 March, which also coincides with the nationwide lockdown across India.
However, when it comes to Delhi government guidelines, the matter becomes a little more complex. The Delhi government’s demand to register an FIR against a Tablighi Jamaat Maulana is based on two sets of notices - one on 13 and 16 March and the other on 12 March.
First, the Delhi government has accused the Tablighi Jamaat Markaz of violating its 13 March forbidding the gathering of more than 200 people.
Strong action should be taken against the administrators of the Nizamuddin Markaz who organised a 3-day religious gathering, with 1000s of people from 13th-15th March, when Delhi Govt orders had expressely forbidden gatherings or more than 200 persons on 13th March itself pic.twitter.com/n0f1rLE5Xx— Atishi (@AtishiAAP) March 31, 2020
However the problem is that the notices talks about “all sports gathering” and it is not clear if this extends to religions gatherings.
It is only on 16 March that the Delhi government specifically banned religious gatherings, in addition to discotheques and theaters.
So this indicates that these were not covered under the 13 March guidelines.
Delhi government notification banning religious gatherings came only on March 16.— The Politician (@ThePolitician10) March 30, 2020
This happened on March 8 to 10. So why the organisers are blamed? pic.twitter.com/Y6A5dP6pKo
If the reports of the Tablighi Jamaat event being from 13-15 of March are true, then these don’t violate the 16 March government notice.
The second notice that is being cited by the Delhi government to justify the FIR against the Tablighi Jamaat representative is from 12 March, specifically clauses 8 and 9.
Moreover, notification by Delhi Govt on 12th March stated that anyone with a travel history from COVID-19 affected countries have to self-isolate, then why did the administrators of the Markaz not ensure isolation of residents coming from those countries? pic.twitter.com/zqd8lzAPOC— Atishi (@AtishiAAP) March 31, 2020
Clauses 8 says that any person with a travel history from a COVID-19 affected country in the last 14 days witnessing Coronavirus symptoms, must report the control rooms.
Clause 9 says that any person with a travel history from a COVID-19 affected country in the last 14 days and not developing symptoms, must quarantine themselves.
Now, based on these clauses a few sets of people at the Markaz could be in violation:
- Those who arrived in India from a COVID-19 affected country after 27 February and failed to report to the control room despite developing Coronavirus symptoms.
- Those who arrived in India from a COVID-19 affected country after 27 February and didn’t self-quarantine themselves.
It is not clear how many people are there in these two categories.
Also while the 13 and 16 March notices put the onus on the organisers of the events, he onus of the 12 March notice is on individual travellers. So it is debatable if it can be used to book the organisers.
Is Tablighi Jamaat to Blame?
While it is not clear if the FIR against a Tablighi Jamaat Maulana is justified, the outfit cannot be absolved from blame.
The full outbreak of COVID-19 in China was around December. The first reported case in Thailand was around 13 January. This was the first COVID-19 case outside China.
Malaysia reported its first few cases on 25 January. India had its first case on 30 January. Indonesia was hit much later.
Therfore with the outbreak hitting countries like Thailand in January, the Tablighi Jamaat should have been careful not to invite visitors from there.
By first week of March, the Coronavirus threat was acute in different parts of the world. Therefore it was reckless of the Tablighi Jamaat Markaz to hold a large congregation in the second week of March, that too with a sizable number of foreign visitors.
What Did Govt Do?
A bigger part of the blame however lies with the government of India.
According to a release from the Ministry of Home Affairs on 31 March, “Bureau of Immigration has been sharing (since February 1) with State authorities, details of all international arrivals from affected countries based on Self Declaration Form filled-in by them”.
- Now, if government had started tracking this from 1 February. Why were travellers from COVID-19 affected countries allowed into India in the first place?
- Why weren’t they screened at the airport?
- Why were massive functions allowed in the month of March, be it the Tablighi congregation, Ram Navmi celebrations in Ayodhya attended by CM Yogi Adityanath, or Hola Mohalla in Punjab? Even BJP celebrated the formation of its government in Madhya Pradesh with a massive function.
Coming back to Tablighi Jamaat Markaz, a few questions need to be answered by the police that falls under the ministry of home affairs.
- The Markaz is located less than 100 meters from Nizamuddin police station. Why didn’t police take steps to stop the congregations that took place in the second week of March?
- MHA claims that foreigners who come to the Markaz report their arrival to the Nizamuddin police station. Why weren’t foreigners who came from a COVID-19 affected country, made to undergo tests by the police?
While there's little doubt that the Tablighi Jamaat Markaz showed callousness, a bigger part of the blame lies with the government that woke up to the COVID-19 threat extremely late and didn't do enough to stop carriers of the virus at airports.
The "Corona Jihad" campaign by pro-Hindutva entities in the media and social media will only worsen matters by injecting communal poison into a public health disaster.